Education: Gene Screening Raises Questions: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis allows parents to choose children for their genes



 The issue of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)  is one that is very dear to my heart. My husband and I have a genetic condition that has a 50% chance of being passed on to our kids. We keep talking and trying to decide on if we should try naturally again or if we should opt for PGD. The story below is an example of PGD......



After losing two children to a deadly genetic disease and aborting a fetus that tested positive for the same disease, an unidentified French couple gave birth to France's first genetically screened baby in November. But the process that ensured the couple a healthy baby, PGD is furrowing eyebrows internationally over difficult ethical issues.
 
PGD uses the same techniques as prenatal diagnostic testing, but is done at the moment of fertilization, before doctors have implanted the embryo in a woman's womb. That means fertilized embryos testing positive for unwanted genetic traits can easily be discarded in the search for a child with specific genetic code.



A U.S. couple gave birth to a PGD-screened child in October. Adam Nash was tested as an embryo to see if his DNA matched that of his older sister, who needed the blood from his umbilical cord to help fight her rare case of Fanconi anemia. The Nashes' decision is the first known case in which parents used genetic testing to select a baby on the basis of his ability to save a sibling's life, setting what many bioethicists are calling a worrisome precedent for other desperate parents of ailing children.
Overall, PGD has been performed in over 40 genetics centers around the world. Nearly 400 children have been born from approximately 2,000 cycles of testing performed for genetic or chromosomal disorders. That means roughly eight of every ten embryos were not implanted and carried to term.
Proponents of the new technique say PGD is simply a method of helping couples in a painful predicament who desire to have children of their own.




But Ben Mitchell, senior fellow at the Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity in Bannockburn, Illinois, disagrees.
"There is very little we can actually do once an embryo or fetus has been diagnosed with a genetic condition, " Mitchell told CT. "So the main function of the test is really used to inform parents to abort or to discard an embryo before it is implanted."
Mitchell says he has much sympathy for the Nashes' situation, but he worries about the "almost grotesque precedent" their decision has set for the biotech community.
"We have gone against Christian and even Western tradition here. Instead of saying that each person is an end unto themselves, this case says that people can be used as a means to the end. … You are having a child expressly to serve the needs of another child."




Mitchell says that cases like this might wake Christians up to the implications of new biotechnologies.
"This is a chance for the church to contribute to some important questions involving procreative liberty and personhood," Mitchell says. "Right now the unborn are not recognized as legal persons, and technologies are rapidly developing that will use them as commodities."
David O'Steen of the National Right to Life Committee says that it also finds PGD "a terrible waste of human life." "Human life begins at fertilization," he says. "Those embryos are human beings just like you and me."

News Culled from:  http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2001/february19/12.18.html
Image Culled from: www.empoweredivf.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Over 40s 'have more babies' than under 20s

Image
Women over 40 are having more babies than the under 20s for the first time in nearly 70 years, official figures for England and Wales show. The Office for National Statistics data showed there were 697,852 live births in 2015. There were 15.2 births per 1,000 women aged over 40, compared with just 14.5 per 1,000 women in their teens. The last time the over 40s had the higher fertility rate was in 1947, in the wake of WWII. The figures show two key trends in who is having children and when in England and Wales. The teenage pregnancy rate has been in long-term decline and has more than halved from the 33 births per 1,000 teenagers in 1990. Meanwhile, pregnancies have soared in older age groups from 5.3 per 1,000 in 1990. The average age of having a child is now 30.3 - a figure that has been increasing since 1975. Advances in fertility treatment as well as more wo
Read more

Ectopic Pregnancy Symptoms and Signs

Image
What is an ectopic pregnancy? Ectopic pregnancy is a common, potentially life–threatening, condition affecting one in 100 pregnancies. An ectopic pregnancy occurs when the fertilised egg implants outside the cavity of the womb, usually in the fallopian tube. As the pregnancy grows, the fallopian tube stretches causing pain. If not treated quickly enough, the tube can burst, causing internal bleeding, which can lead to collapse and even death. What causes an ectopic pregnancy? Normally a fertilised egg travels from the ovary down the fallopian tube and implants into the wall of the womb six to seven days after fertilisation. In an ectopic pregnancy the egg does not travel to the uterus or womb but instead implants somewhere outside the womb, usually in one of the narrow fallopian tubes where it cannot develop properly. In most cases the exact cause of an ectopic pregnancy is unknown but it is often a result of some sort of damage to the fallopian tube. The tube may have
Read more

Concern Zika causes baby eye problems

Image
Scientists studying the Zika outbreak in Brazil are becoming increasingly concerned the virus may cause eye damage in babies. Stanford University researchers found abnormal bleeding and lesions in the eyes of three infant boys whose mothers had caught Zika while pregnant. They want any babies known to be affected by Zika to have eye checks. The journal of Ophthalmology findings follow another recent study that saw similar eye problems in Zika babies. The disease is already known to cause a serious baby brain defect called microcephaly. What is not clear is whether eye problems might be a complication of this rather than the Zika infection itself. Either is possible. All of the three infants the researchers from Stanford and the University of Sao Paulo examined also had microcephaly.
Read more